Research & Validation
Comprehensive Model Validation
We are actively developing and evaluating our rPPG models across the health metrics we measure. Our ongoing research involves benchmarking against reference devices under a range of real-world conditions.
Select a metric to learn more about our research approach and current findings.
Request Validation Report
Select a metric and we'll send you detailed validation data.
Published rPPG Research
Explore the foundational research behind remote photoplethysmography technology
TYrPPG: Uncomplicated and Enhanced Learning Capability rPPG for Remote Heart Rate Estimation
Taixi Chen, Yiu-ming Cheung • November 2025
A novel approach to simplify rPPG models while enhancing learning capability for accurate remote heart rate estimation.
Read Paper →Gaze into the Heart: A Multi-View Video Dataset for rPPG and Health Biomarkers Estimation
Konstantin Egorov, Stepan Botman, Pavel Blinov, et al. • August 2025
Introduces a comprehensive multi-view video dataset for advancing rPPG research and health biomarker estimation.
Read Paper →Advancing Generalizable Remote Physiological Measurement through the Integration of Explicit and Implicit Prior Knowledge
Yuting Zhang, Hao Lu, Xin Liu, et al. • March 2024
Proposes methods to improve generalization in remote physiological measurement by combining explicit and implicit prior knowledge.
Read Paper →Reperio-rPPG: Relational Temporal Graph Neural Networks for Periodicity Learning in Remote Physiological Measurement
Ba-Thinh Nguyen, Thach-Ha Ngoc Pham, Hoang-Long Duc Nguyen, et al. • November 2025
Leverages graph neural networks to capture temporal relationships for improved periodicity learning in rPPG signals.
Read Paper →Deep Learning-based Remote Photoplethysmography Methods: A Review
Various Authors • 2023
Comprehensive review of deep learning approaches for camera-based physiological measurement and vital sign estimation.
Read Paper →Evaluation of Biases in Remote Photoplethysmography Methods
Various Authors • 2021
Critical analysis of biases present in rPPG methods across different demographics and lighting conditions.
Read Paper →